The recent news that Apple is finalizing a deal to use Google's Gemini models for the next generation of Siri is being hailed as a "pragmatic move." It is pragmatic. It is also a capitulation.
For the last decade, the equation of value was: Device + OS + App. But we are entering the era of Contextual UI. When AI becomes the primary interface, we stop poking glass (Touch UI) and start stating intent (Natural Language). By handing the core intelligence of this new interface to Google, Apple isn't just buying a service; they are outsourcing their future.
1. The Ghost of Yahoo!
This situation reminds me of the fall of Yahoo. Yahoo didn't die because of bad products. It died because of a strategic miscalculation.
- The Mistake: Yahoo viewed Search as a utility—a feature to be outsourced.
- The Reality: Search was the Input Mechanism for user intent.
Yahoo outsourced the engine to Google.
- User Input: Flowed to Google.
- Algorithm Training: Google got smarter.
- The Result: Yahoo became a shell; Google became the internet.
Apple is doing the exact same thing. They are viewing Generative AI as a "feature" to plug into Siri, rather than the new operating system itself.
2. It's Not an API; It's a Brain Transplant
Defenders say: "It's just an API. Apple can switch to OpenAI or Anthropic later." This fundamentally misunderstands the difference between Data Transfer and Agentic Reasoning.
The API Model (Data Transfer):
- User asks a question.
- Apple passes text to Google.
- Google returns text.
- Value: Low. This is commoditized.
The System Layer (Agentic AI):
- User says: "I want to fly to Japan next week for skiing."
- The AI must decide:
The Threat: Whoever controls the Decision Layer owns the user. If Google’s Gemini is the brain deciding which apps to open and how to execute the task, Apple is just the hardware shell passing the message.
3. The Learning Loop is the Moat
The provider of the AI (Google) gains the ultimate advantage: The Learning Loop.
- Input: How do users express complex intent?
- Reasoning: How does the model rewrite and execute the plan?
- Outcome: Did the user accept the result?
Even if Apple runs the model on-device for privacy, or hosts it in their "Private Cloud Compute," the Model Weights—the actual intelligence—belong to Google. Google gets the telemetry on how to make the model smarter. Apple just gets the privacy liability.
As Anthropic’s Dario Amodei noted regarding open-source models: "Open Weights" is not "Open Source." You can run the model, but you don't understand the internal decision mechanism. Apple is holding the black box, but Google holds the keys to the engine.
4. The Commoditization of the iPhone
Apple’s premium pricing relies on the integration of hardware and software magic. But if the "Magic" is provided by Google, what is the iPhone? It is just a screen.
- A TV is a screen. It has no premium.
- A monitor is a screen. It has no premium.
If the workflow of the future is:
- Input: Voice/Context (Sent to AI).
- Processing: Agentic AI (Owned by Google).
- Output: Visual Confirmation (Displayed on iPhone).
Then the iPhone becomes a dumb terminal for Google's Supercomputer. We don't pay $1,500 for a dumb terminal.
Conclusion: A Dangerous Rationality
Apple's decision is "rational" for the short term. Their own LLM technology (Ajax) is lagging, and they need a competitive Siri now. But strategies that are rational in the short term can be fatal in the long term.
Yahoo rationalized outsourcing search. IBM rationalized outsourcing the OS to Microsoft. Apple is rationalizing outsourcing the Brain to Google.
Unless Apple can pull this back in-house before the Contextual UI fully replaces the App Grid, the iPhone will suffer the same fate as the Yahoo Portal: A once-dominant gateway that forgot to own the destination.
Mercury Technology Solutions: Accelerate Digitality.